Three-Year Long Botanical Study Confirms The Ramayana Is Not A Myth

People fight and kill in the name of religion and religion gets a bad name. But does this completely negate anything and everything to do with religion, including the stories he speaks of?

Hindus have long believed that the epics – Ramayana and Mahabharata – are not works of fantasy but real stories told and written by sages. It is important to remember that Vedic culture was originally oral, as sacred texts and hymns were passed down orally from generation to generation and are therefore much older than their written counterparts. They were written much later.If you are looking for Hindu studies online classes visit 

Hindu studies online ,Indic studies


In epics such as the Ramayana, the sages play the role of historians who write stories in sloki (poetry) form. In fact, the sage Valmiki is believed to be a contemporary of the story's hero and is believed to have lived somewhere in the first millennium BC. when the epic takes place across India.

Scientists were surprised when they confirmed that all 182 plant species mentioned in the epic were found in their natural habitat, as history shows. From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, they managed to identify the exact location of forests, sites and reserves by mapping the flora and fauna in detail.

But does this prove that the Ramayana actually took place in these landscapes, particularly as described in this book? To be fair to skeptics, these answers are still largely based on our individual beliefs and beliefs and not research. 

It is important to note here that the two botanists were not the only Crusaders seeking to prove the validity of this ancient epic. There are many theories and studies that approach the subject from different angles  to confirm the belief of Hindus in its historical validity.